Appendix

Assurances

Independent Assurance Statement5.2.1

Introduction and objectives of work

BSI Group Korea(hereinafter "the Assurer") was asked to verify Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. Ltd.'s ‘2021 Sustainability Report(hereinafter the Report"). This assurance statement applies only to the relevant information contained in the scope of the assurance. Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. is solely responsible for all information and assertion contained in the report. The responsibility of the assurer is to provide independent assurance statement with expert opinions to Hyundai Steel's executives by applying the verification methodology and

Assurance Standards and Levels

This assurance wa s based on the AA1000 AS v3(20 20 ) Assurance Standard and confirmed that the report is prepared in accordance with the Core Option of GRI Standards. The assurance level was based on the Type 1 that confirmed compliance with the four principles of AA1000 AP in accordance with the AA1000 AS and the Type 2 assurance that verified the quality and reliability of the information disclosed in the report. Type 2 was verified for energy consumption, energy intensity, water consumption, water discharge, direct GHG emissions(Scope 1) indirect GHG emissions(Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity, waste generated and workers covered by an occupational health and safety management

Scope of Assurance

The scope of assurance applied to this report is as follows;
  • Based on the period from January 1st to December 31st, 20 20 included in the report
  • Appropriateness and consistency of processes and systems for data collection, analysis and review
  • Major assertion included in the report such as sustainability management policies, strategies objectives, business and performance
  • Information related to material issues determined as a result of materiality assessment
  • The following items were not included in this assurance
    • Financial information SASB Index, WEF Index, TCFD Index, UNGC Index and UN SDGs Index included in the report
    • Other related additional information such as the website presented in the report

Methodology

As part of its independent assurance, the assurer has used the methodology developed to collect relevant evidence to comply with the verification criter ia and to reduce errors in the reporting, and has performed the following activities;
  • To determine verification priorities, review of materiality issue analysis process and verification of the results
  • System review for sustainability strategy process and implementation
  • Review the evidence to support the material issues through interviews with senior managers with responsibility for them
  • Verification of data generation, collection and reporting for each performance index

Assurance Opinion

On the basis of our methodology and the activities described above, it is our opinion that
  • The information and data included in 2020 Hyundai Steel Sustainability Report are accurate and reliable and the a ssurer cannot point out any substantial aspects of material with mistake or misstatement .
  • The report was prepared according to the Core option of the GRI Standards
The assurance opinion on the four principles presented by the AA1000 AP(2018) is as follows.

AA1000 AP (2018)

Inclusivity: Stakeholder Engagement and Opinion

Hyundai Steel has a stakeholder engagement process in which key stakeholders such as executives and employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, government, press agency and NGOs participate. It was confirmed that key stakeholders' expectations and various opinions are collected and the drawn agenda is reflected in decision making on sustainability management.

Materiality: Identification and reporting of material sustainability topics

Hyundai Steel conducted international standard analysis, industry issue analysis, advanced company benchmarking, media research, and stakeholder survey to derive economic, social, and environmental material reporting issues related to sustainability management and determined priorities by measuring social interest and evaluating business impact, and reported a total of 5 material sustainability management topics

Responsiveness: Responding to material sustainability topics and related impacts

Hyundai Steel established and implemented plans for each topic to appropriately respond to identified material topics in a way that reflects stakeholders' expectations, and detailed response activities and performance on

Impact: Impact of an organization's activities and material sustainability topics on the organization and stakeholders

Hyundai Steel implement ed the process to identify and evaluate the impact on organizations and stakeholders related to material topics, and the financial impact and reputational impact of ESG are identified as cost, revenue, and reputation risk by material topics
Key areas for ongoing development
To the extent that the results of the verification are not affected, the following comments were made.
  • If the internal verification process is implemented to manage the data quality and reliability disclosed in the report, it is expected that the reporting process will be continuously improved.
  • In order to identify material issues, it is necessary to include a wider range of sustainability themes in the pool, and when selecting material topics, it is necessary to increase the proportion of external stakeholders so that issues with high social interest can be selected.
  • Although the impact on organizations and stakeholders related to material topics is identified in terms of financial and reputational, it is recommended to include a means to measure potential impacts, including environmental and social impacts.

Statement of independence and competence

The a ssurer is an independent professional institution that specializes in quality, health, safety, social and environ mental management with almost 12 0 years history in providing independent assurance services. No member of the assurance team has a business relationship with Hyundai Steel The assurer have conducted this verification independently, and there has been no conflict of interest. All assurers who participated in the assurance have qualifications as AA1000AS assurer, have a lot of assurance experience, and understand the BSI Group's assurance standard methodology.

Evaluation against GRI ‘In Accordance' Criteria

The assurer confirmed that this report was prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards Core Option and the disclosures related to the following Universal Standards and Topic specific Standards Indicators based on the data provided by Hyundai Steel.

Universal Standards

Organinalzational Profile 102 102-1~13/ Strategy 102 102-14/ Ethics and Integrity 102 102-16/ Governance 102-18, 102-21, 102-22, 102-23, 102-24, 102-31, 102-36, 102-38/ Stakeholder Engagement 102-40~44 / Reporting practice 102-45~56/ Management Approach 103-1~3

Topic specific Standards

  • Economic: 201-1, 201-3, 201-4, 205-3, 206-1
  • Environmental: 301-1, 301-2, 302-1, 303-3, 303-4, 303-5, 304-2, 304-3, 305-1, 305-2, 305-4, 305-7, 306-1, 306-2, 306-3, 307-1, 308-2
  • Social: 401-1, 402-1, 403-1, 403-3, 403-4, 403-6, 403-7, 403-8, 404-1, 404-2, 405-1, 406-1, 410-1, 412-1, 412-2, 413-1, 414-2, 416-2, 417-2, 417-3, 418-1

4 June 2021
K. S. Song / BSI Group Korea,
Managing Director